Revisiting The James Neal Trade
On the heels of yesterday’s news that the Pittsburgh Penguins have re-signed their star power-forward James Neal to a six-year, 30 million-dollar contract, I thought I would revisit the trade that brought Neal to the Penguins in the first place. I considered calling the blog “Bad Trades, Revisited,” but I wanted to save the suspense that comes with unveiling my opinion for the fourth line of the blog.
That’s right, I believe the Dallas Stars should have never traded James Neal (and Matt Niskanen) for Alex Goligoski. It’s pretty simple: a top-line sniper, especially a top-line power forward, well, really you shouldn’t trade them at all, but if you are going to trade one for a defenseman, a top-line sniper should equate to a #1 defenseman, or a good #2 at worst. Just like a second-line forward equates to a “top-four” defenseman, usually meaning a #4 – #3 type of guy. The Stars mistake was in trading a top-line power-forward for a “top-four” defenseman in Alex Goligoski instead of a “top-pairing” guy.
Now I know all these hockey terms can be confusing, and maybe that’s where the misunderstanding happened for Dallas’ management team, but… Oh, wait, what is this I’m hearing? Dallas’ GM is an ex-hockey player? He knows the lingo? In that case, there is no excuse. CONTINUE READING FULL POST
Reply